Language
English (UK)
Spanish (Latin America)
Inter- and transdisciplinary mountain data across the Andes
Please be assured that no personal data will be shared, and that potential identifying information will be removed from all responses during compilation of the results
Name
*
First Name
Last Name
Email
*
example@example.com
Institution
*
Country
*
Please Select
United States
Afghanistan
Albania
Algeria
American Samoa
Andorra
Angola
Anguilla
Antigua and Barbuda
Argentina
Armenia
Aruba
Australia
Austria
Azerbaijan
The Bahamas
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Barbados
Belarus
Belgium
Belize
Benin
Bermuda
Bhutan
Bolivia
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana
Brazil
Brunei
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cambodia
Cameroon
Canada
Cape Verde
Cayman Islands
Central African Republic
Chad
Chile
China
Christmas Island
Cocos (Keeling) Islands
Colombia
Comoros
Congo
Cook Islands
Costa Rica
Cote d'Ivoire
Croatia
Cuba
Curaçao
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Democratic Republic of the Congo
Denmark
Djibouti
Dominica
Dominican Republic
Ecuador
Egypt
El Salvador
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Estonia
Ethiopia
Falkland Islands
Faroe Islands
Fiji
Finland
France
French Polynesia
Gabon
The Gambia
Georgia
Germany
Ghana
Gibraltar
Greece
Greenland
Grenada
Guadeloupe
Guam
Guatemala
Guernsey
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Guyana
Haiti
Honduras
Hong Kong
Hungary
Iceland
India
Indonesia
Iran
Iraq
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Jamaica
Japan
Jersey
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Kenya
Kiribati
North Korea
South Korea
Kosovo
Kuwait
Kyrgyzstan
Laos
Latvia
Lebanon
Lesotho
Liberia
Libya
Liechtenstein
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Macau
Macedonia
Madagascar
Malawi
Malaysia
Maldives
Mali
Malta
Marshall Islands
Martinique
Mauritania
Mauritius
Mayotte
Mexico
Micronesia
Moldova
Monaco
Mongolia
Montenegro
Montserrat
Morocco
Mozambique
Myanmar
Nagorno-Karabakh
Namibia
Nauru
Nepal
Netherlands
Netherlands Antilles
New Caledonia
New Zealand
Nicaragua
Niger
Nigeria
Niue
Norfolk Island
Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus
Northern Mariana
Norway
Oman
Pakistan
Palau
Palestine
Panama
Papua New Guinea
Paraguay
Peru
Philippines
Pitcairn Islands
Poland
Portugal
Puerto Rico
Qatar
Republic of the Congo
Romania
Russia
Rwanda
Saint Barthelemy
Saint Helena
Saint Kitts and Nevis
Saint Lucia
Saint Martin
Saint Pierre and Miquelon
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
Samoa
San Marino
Sao Tome and Principe
Saudi Arabia
Senegal
Serbia
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Singapore
Slovakia
Slovenia
Solomon Islands
Somalia
Somaliland
South Africa
South Ossetia
South Sudan
Spain
Sri Lanka
Sudan
Suriname
Svalbard
eSwatini
Sweden
Switzerland
Syria
Taiwan
Tajikistan
Tanzania
Thailand
Timor-Leste
Togo
Tokelau
Tonga
Transnistria Pridnestrovie
Trinidad and Tobago
Tristan da Cunha
Tunisia
Turkey
Turkmenistan
Turks and Caicos Islands
Tuvalu
Uganda
Ukraine
United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom
Uruguay
Uzbekistan
Vanuatu
Vatican City
Venezuela
Vietnam
British Virgin Islands
Isle of Man
US Virgin Islands
Wallis and Futuna
Western Sahara
Yemen
Zambia
Zimbabwe
Gender
Please Select
Female
Male
Non-binary
Prefer not to say
Back
Next
1. What type of organisation do you work for?
Please Select
University / research
National hydrological / meteorological organisation or similar
Other governmental agency / local authority
Charity / NGO
Private sector
Other
If "Other," please specify:
2. Are you predominantly a data provider, a data user, or both?
Please Select
Data provider
Data user
Both
Neither
3. What types of data do your professional activities mostly rely on?
Please Select
In situ data (time series or punctual samples / surveys)
Remotely-sensed geospatial data
Simulated geospatial data
Statistical / tabular data aggregated across spatial regions
A combination of the above
4. Which disciplines are most relevant for your role? (max. 5)
Meteorology and climate science
Climate change (mitigation and/or adaptation)
Cryopshere
Hydrology
Biosphere / ecology
Natural hazards / DRR
Energy
Society and economy
Agriculture
Tourism
Environmental management
Sustainable development
Other (please specify below)
5. At what spatial scale do you mostly work?
Local (e.g. small field sites)
Regional (e.g. catchment-scale, administrative districts, etc.)
Mountain range (e.g. entire Andes)
Global
Across scales
6. On what time horizon do you mostly work?
Historical: Paleo
Historical: Recent years and decades (including ongoing long-term monitoring)
Future: Real-time or near real-time forecasting
Future: Seasonal projections
Future: Longer term projections / planning, including probabilistic approaches
Multiple time horizons
Back
Next
7. To your knowledge, are the measurements / datasets required for your role(s) actually being made / exist?
Not at all
1
2
3
4
Completely
5
1 is Not at all, 5 is Completely
8. How do you currently discover potentially useful datasets? (max 3)
Word of mouth / from colleagues
From reading journal articles and technical reports
From conference / virtual presentations
Via web-searches (e.g. Google)
By searching dedicated geospatial catalogues (e.g. NASA Earth Explorer, Copernicus Open Access Hub, GEO System of Systems)
All of the above
Other (please specify below)
9. Do you / would you consider paying licence fees to obtain access to important datasets?
Never
Sometimes
Often
10. Do you currently experience difficulties in discovering, accessing, or using the necessary data for your work?
Never
1
2
3
4
Frequently
5
1 is Never, 5 is Frequently
11. What are the most critical lacking datasets for your role? (Please list, separated by ";")
12. Are the documentation and metadata that accompany the datasets you use generally sufficient / informative?
Never
1
2
3
4
Frequently
5
1 is Never, 5 is Frequently
13. Do technical or computational constraints limit your ability to obtain results / insights from the available data and information?
Never
1
2
3
4
Frequently
5
1 is Never, 5 is Frequently
14. To what extent would addressing the most critical data / access gaps identified improve the efficiency and impact of your work?
Not much
1
2
3
4
Greatly
5
1 is Not much, 5 is Greatly
15. If applicable, please provide links to examples of good practice in the region in terms of ease of data quality, data access, and/or metadata provision (Please list, separated by ";")
Back
Next
16. Do you generally make your own data freely available to others for research / non-commercial purposes?
Please Select
Yes
No
Not applicable
If yes, what is your preferred method for doing so?
Please Select
Institutional repository
External repository (e.g. figshare, Mendeley Data, PANGAEA etc.)
Dedicated geospatial portal
Other
Not applicable
If "Other," please specify:
17. What is your primary motivation for sharing data?
Please Select
Service to the community
Provide my data in the hope others will do likewise
Mandated by journal / funding agency
Mandated by institution / organisation
Not applicable
18. Which of the following steps from data obtention to delivery/sharing do you consider to be most problematic? (max. 1)
Making the actual measurements / data processing
Generating informative metadata
Finding a suitable persistent and discoverable repository
Selecting an appropriate licencing option
Not applicable (e.g. I am a not a data provider)
Other (please specify below)
19. What do you perceive to be the major barriers preventing more routine / extensive data sharing and exchange? (max. 3)
Limited time / funding
Limited technical capacity
Institutional competition
Not all journals / funding agencies require data sharing (lack of incentive)
Large file sizes / IT constraints
Other (please specify below)
20. To what extent are you concerned that your data could be applied for purposes that they were not developed for (i.e. misused) ?
Not at all
1
2
3
4
Extremely concerned
5
1 is Not at all, 5 is Extremely concerned
Back
Next
21. Do you consider Open Data (and Open Science more generally) to be important for the advancement of your discipline and related policy and practice?
Unimportant
1
2
3
4
Extremely important
5
1 is Unimportant, 5 is Extremely important
22. For what proportion of your projects / articles in the last 5 years did you make research materials (including data) freely available?
Please Select
None
> 0% but < 50%
> 50% but < 100%
All
23. Do you consider the increased prominence and recognition of "data publications" (e.g. in journals such as Earth System Science Data and Scientific Data) to be a positive development?
No
1
2
3
4
Yes
5
1 is No, 5 is Yes
24. Which of the following strategies hold most potential for improving the availability and usability of climate and climate impact-related data in mountain terrain? (tick all that apply)
Extend existing in situ observatories and establish new ones, ultimately developing a network of Mountain Observatories with some common standards
Exploit the potential of contemporary high-resolution satellite-based Earth Observation products and related technologies (e.g. Data Cubes)
Combine in situ data, remotely-sensed data, and numerical models to generate spatially and temporally complete datasets that are informed to the greatest extent possible by all available observations
Exploit the latest climate models for both historical reanalyses and future predictions
Other (please specify below)
Back
Next
25. In your opinion, what functionality would an ideal online data portal have? (max. 5)
Efficient filtering by region / discipline
Link to / provision of associated documentation and metadata
Link to data repository and straightforward data download
Geospatial visualisation
Geospatial interaction (e.g. querying layers)
Ability to create and download spatio-temporal subsets
Ability to combine datasets to generate metrics oriented towards policy- and decision makers
Information on associated licencing conditions for each dataset
Other (please specify below)
26. "The large number of different geospatial data portals complicates the discovery of relevant datasets": To what extent do you agree?
Disagree
1
2
3
4
Agree
5
1 is Disagree, 5 is Agree
27. "The data portals that I use often suffer from limited functionality (e.g. broken links, crashes, etc.)": To what extent do you agree?
Disagree
1
2
3
4
Agree
5
1 is Disagree, 5 is Agree
28. Would you consider a dedicated regional inventory / data portal to be important?
Unimportant
1
2
3
4
Extremely important
5
1 is Unimportant, 5 is Extremely important
29. Do you have any further reflections on the situation and possible challenges regarding inter/transdisciplinary data in your mountain region(s) or globally (e.g., financial/institutional barriers, site access and conditions, geopolitical situation, data discoverability, collaboration, data access and sharing, infrastructure, funding, technical capacity, etc.)?
30. Would you like us to contact you to discuss any aspect of your responses confidentially?
Yes
No
Submit
Should be Empty: